| I. INTRODUCTION | 1 |
| 1. Transfer of Debtor's Property | 4 |
| 2. The Transfers Were to a Creditor of the Debtor | 4 |
| 3. The Transfer Was on Account of an Antecedent Debt | 5 |
| 4. The Transfer Was Made While the Debtor Was Insolvent | 5 |
| 5. The Transfer Was Made on or Within 90 Days Before the Filing of the Petition | 5 |
| 6. The Defendant Received More Than It Would Have from a Liquidation | 5 |
| II. PREFERENTIAL TRANSFERS | 6 |
| A. Objective Application | 6 |
| B. Transfer Requirement | 7 |
| 1. Transfer Broadly Defined | 7 |
| 2. Time of Transfer | 7 |
| 3. Transfer by Check | 9 |
| 4. Transfer Must be Shown | 10 |
| C. Interest of the Debtor in Property Requirement | 10 |
| 1. Interest of the Debtor in Property Requirement | 10 |
| 2. Existence of a Trust/Constructive Trust | 13 |
| 3. Earmarked Funds | 14 |
| 4. PonziScheme Funds | 19 |
| D. Antecedent Debt Requirement | 19 |
| 1. Claim and Debt Defined | 19 |
| 2. Timing | 19 |
| E. Insolvency Requirement | 20 |
| 1. Insolvent Defined | 20 |
| 2. Presumption of Insolvency | 21 |
| 3. Insolvency Tested on the Date of Transfer | 22 |
| 4. Fair Valuation | 22 |
| F. Transfer Made on or Within 90 Days Before the Petition Date | 25 |
| G. Greater Percentage Test -Section 547(b)(5) | 26 |
| 1. Hypothetical Liquidation | 26 |
| 2. FullySecured or Over-Secured Creditors | 28 |
| III. PREFERENCE DEFENSES | 29 |
| A. Purpose of Defenses | 30 |
| B. Waiver of Defenses | 30 |
| C. Burden of Proof | 31 |
| D. Section 547(c)(1) -Contemporaneous Exchange for New Value | 32 |
| 1. Overview | 32 |
| 2. New Value Defined for Purposes of Section 547(c)(1) | 33 |
| 3. "Contemporaneous Exchange" | 5 |
| 4. Specific Cases Discussing New Value | 34 |
| 5. Application of Defense to Secured Creditors | 36 |
| 6. In Fact a Substantially Contemporaneous Exchange | 37 |
| a. Payment by Check | 38 |
| b. Miscellaneous Cases | 39 |
| E. Section 547(c)(2) -Ordinary Course of Business Defense | 39 |
| 1. Overview | 39 |
| 2. Debt "Incurred" in Ordinary Course ofBusiness | 41 |
| 3. Section 547(c)(2)(A) Parameters of Subjective Test: The Specific Relationship Among the Transferor and the Transferee | 42 |
| 4. Section 547(c)(2)(B) Parameters of Subjective Test: IndustryStandards | 50 |
| 5. "The Effective Use of Evidence to Prove Industry Standards Under [pre-BAPCPA] 547(c)(2)(C) | 57 |
| a. Introduction | 57 |
| b. The Burden of Proving Ordinary Business Terms | 57 |
| c. Evidence Sufficient to Prove IndustryStandards | 60 |
| d. Evidence Insufficient to Prove IndustryStandards | 64 |
| e. Conclusion | 70 |
| 6. "The Role of Wire Transfers and Electronic Commerce Within the Context of S547(c)(2) | 71 |
| F. Section 547(c)(3) -Relating Back | 75 |
| G. Section 547(c)(4) - New Value Exception | 77 |
| 1. Overview | 77 |
| 2. Purpose of Defense | 77 |
| 3. Definition of New Value | 78 |
| 4. To or for the Benefit of the Debtor | 79 |
| 5. New Value May Not be Secured by an Otherwise Unavoidable Security Interest to or for the Benefit of the Creditor Extending New Value | 80 |
| 6. New Value After Transfer | 80 |
| 7. New Value Must Remain Unpaid | 81 |
| 8. Calculation | 82 |
| 9. Timing of the Transfer When the Transfer is by Check | 84 |
| 10. New Value Must be from Transfers | 85 |
| H. Section 547(c)(5) Floating Liens | 85 |
| 1. Overview | 85 |
| 2. Policy | 85 |
| 3. Elements of Defense | 86 |
| I. Section 547(c)(6) -Statutory Liens | 88 |
| 1. Overview | 88 |
| J. Section 547(c)(7) -Bona Fide Payments for Alimony, Maintenance, and Support | 88 |
| K. Section 547(c)(8) -"De Minimis" Transfers in Consumer Case | 89 |
| L. Section 547(c)(9) | 90 |
| M. Alternate Repayment Schedule | 91 |
| N. Venue/Limited Liability | 91 |
| O. "Ten Practical Tips in Defending an Avoidance Action | 92 |
| 1. Know the Facts | 92 |
| 2. Chart the Factual History | 93 |
| 3. Write a Detailed Settlement Letter. | 93 |
| 4. Raise Affirmative Defenses in the Answer | 94 |
| 5. Barriers to Recovery(see Section Vinfra) | 95 |
| 6. Make the Plaintiff Prove All the Elements | 97 |
| 7. Do Not Forget Industry Standards in the Ordinary Course Defense | 98 |
| 8. Do Not Overlook Local Trade Groups and Competitors in Hiring Experts | 100 |
| 9. Make a Jury Demand | 101 |
| 10. Secure All Necessary Evidence | 101 |
| P. Section 549 -PostpetitionTransactions | 102 |
| 1. The Statute | 102 |
| 2. Overview | 103 |
| 3. The Exceptions | 105 |
| IV. FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE | 107 |
| A. If You Feel You Have Paid Too Much for Something You Purchased, Can You Set Aside That Purchase as a Fraudulent Conveyance? | 107 |
| B. Tax Avoidance, or Is It Avoidance of Taxes, or Is It Avoidance of Decisions Regarding Taxes, or | 111 |
| C. Is Indirect Benefit Ever Sufficient to Satisfy the Reasonably Equivalent Value Test for a Corporation That Has Gone to Bat for ItsCorporate Affiliates, and If So When is It Sufficient? | 127 |
| D. Can (May) a Dissolution of Marriage be an Avoidable Transfer? | 129 |
| E. After BFP are There Any Types of Foreclosure Sales that Might Still be Avoidable as a Fraudulent Conveyance? | 131 |
| F. Retroactive Disclaimer of Bequest -Is It a Fraudulent Conveyance? | 135 |
| 1. What is a Disclaimer of Inheritance? | 135 |
| 2. What are the Elements of a Section 548 Fraudulent Conveyance? | 136 |
| 3. Prior to Drye, Did Courts Determine That a Disclaimer of Inheritance Constituted a Fraudulent Conveyance Under Either State Law Fraudulent Conveyance Statutes or Under Section 548(a)? | 136 |
| a. Introduction. | 136 |
| b. Applicability of State Law Fraudulent Conveyance Statutes | 137 |
| c. Applicability of Section 548, the Bankruptcy Code Fraudulent Conveyance Provision | 137 |
| (i) Not Subject to Section 548 | 138 |
| (ii) Subject to Section 548 | 139 |
| G. PonziScheme Payments May be Avoidable as Preferences or as Fraudulent Conveyances | 146 |
| H. Proving Insolvency in Fraudulent Conveyance Action | 151 |
| I. BAPCPAProvisions Relating to Fraudulent Conveyances Under Section 548 | 151 |
| J. Practical"Pointers" as to Procedural Matter | 152 |
| 1. Pleading Cause of Action | 152 |
| 2. Mootness Doctrine | 153 |
| 1. Pleading Cause of Action | 153 |
| 3. Duty to Complete Appellate Record -Sanctions | 153 |
| 4. Scope of Materials to be Considered on Appellate Review | 153 |
| 5. Creditors' Derivative Standing to Pursue Avoidance Actions | 154 |
| K. BankruptcyCode and State Law "Preference" Statute | 155 |
| V. PLAN, PLEADING AND PROCESS ISSUES | 156 |
| A. Introduction | |
| B. Retention of Avoidance Actions in a Plan of Reorganization | 156 |
| 1. Res Judicata and Claim Preclusion | 156 |
| a. General Principles | 156 |
| b. Claim PreclusionofAvoidance Actions | 157 |
| C. Observations with Respect to Plan Drafting | 163 |
| D. Miscellaneous Chapter II Plan Issues | 164 |
| 1. Judicial Estoppel | 164 |
| 2. Releases of Committee Members and Professionals That the Conversion on the planning of the Creditors' Committee in a DIP Order | 166 |
| 3. That the Conversion on the planning of the Creditors' Committee in a DIP Order. | 166 |
| E. Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Issues | 168 |
| F. Section 550 of the Bankruptcy Code | 169 |
| 1. Introduction | 169 |
| 2. Judgment and Value of the Property | 170 |
| 3. Benefit to the Estate | 172 |
| 4. RecoveryAgainst Transferees | 175 |
| a. Overview | 175 |
| b. InitialTransferee vs. Subsequent Transferees | 175 |
| (i) For Value | 177 |
| (ii) Good Faith and Without Knowledge | 177 |
| c. Entityto Whose Benefit Such Transfer Was Made | 180 |
| d. Who is a Transferee -Conduits and the Doctrine of Earmarking | 183 |
| e. Trustee's Ability to Reach-Back Beyond 90 Days | 186 |
| f. Multiple Recoveries | 188 |
| 5. Cash Management and Related Issues | 188 |
| 6. Lien Priority | 189 |
| G. Pleading and Process Issues | 191 |
| 1. Introduction | 191 |
| 2. Recent Delaware Cases Regarding Pleading Requirements | 191 |
| a. Introduction | 191 |
| b. The Valley Media Approach | 192 |
| c. Different Approaches to the Pleading Standard | 193 |
| d. Practice Pointers | 194 |
| H. Other Pleading Issues | 194 |
| 1. Indispensable Party | 194 |
| 2. Setoff and Recoupment as Affirmative Preference Defenses | 195 |
| 3. Essential Vendor Orders | 196 |
| 4. Relation Back and the Statute of Limitations | 196 |
| a. Section 546 | 196 |
| b. Relation Back Cases | 197 |
| 5. Section 502(d) Issues | 198 |
| a. The Preclusive Effect of Allowance of a Claim Under Section 502(d) | 198 |
| b. A Number of Courts Have Rejected the Argument That Section 502(d) Precludes the Assertion of a Preference Claim Following Allowance of a Claim | 199 |
| c. Observations with Respect to the Section 502(d) Issues | 200 |
| 6. Evidentiary Issues | 200 |
| 7. Issues Arising Under Sale Orders | 202 |
| 8. Limitations on Avoidance Actions with Respect to Transfers Under Swap Arrangements | 203 |
| 9. Solverent Immunity | 204 |
| 10. Extra Territorial Effect of Section 548 | 204 |